Two examples of these programs are MapDekode created by the Austrian Peter and GPSMap.
Gps trackmaker pro funçao software#
In spite of the emphasis on Latin American countries, the techniques shown here can be applied to any other part of the word.īecause Garmin™ has seemingly ignored the demand for software tools that allow consumers to create their own maps, some talented European developers have written programs that can produce un-encrypted MapSource® IMG files - IMG files are the actual map files that are downloaded to Garmin GPS units. "The present article shows the Author's personal experience with the MAPDEKODE program together with GPS TrackMaker® and MapSource® for creation of complete background maps for Garmin™ GPS receivers. I have posted many times about the GPS Trackmaker but have really never got any feedback on it. There is a way to get your maps into Garmin. If you are into multifunction gadgets, start with a PDA and add a GPSr SD card receiver. At this point, you can get parts of geocache pages in the PN-20. That is just a lot of data, in many cases.
Gps trackmaker pro funçao full#
I don't think it will be feasible in the near future (years?) to load the full NGS datasheets to a handheld GPSr. There are several threads with reviews of the PN-20, and some early ones of the Colorado on the GPS Units forum. I may use a few more functions of the PN-20 than FX, but by no means all of them.
Gps trackmaker pro funçao free#
Delorme has OK deals going, but free it ain't. Also realize that those maps & pics (on the GPSr) don't come free. If the Colorado offers the same functionality, then "good on them" (as an Aussie friend is fond of saying). Helped a lot with some recoveries yesterday on my way from LA to San Diego, along PCH. Nothing better for Benchmark Hunting than having the USGS Topos and DOQQ aerial imagery (or color if you spend the bucks). Anyone else planning to attend the Seattle or Saratoga events?Īs you can probably tell from the article I wrote (which Patty linked above), I also have a PN-20. Although Groundspeak has set up these joint events to introduce folks to their new Wherigo game, I can't imagine that a roomful of geocachers will let them get away without talking about how the Colorado works for caching! Maybe I'll even get a chance to ask a benchmark-specific question or two. I plan to attend the Groundspeak/Garmin event at REI in Saratoga in early February.
I wonder whether there's a maximum GPX file length per waypoint some datasheets get quite wordy, if they've had multiple, detailed recovery reports over the years. Garmin, of course, only mentions the GPX files from, but I don't imagine there's any reason why NGS datasheets run through BMGPX or a similar program wouldn't also work. Oh, and the ability to load GPX files sounds intriguing.
(I'm ignoring the 400c and the 400i because those models are focused on boating and fishing.) I see that you can also load maps from an SD card onto the Colorado 300, which does not come preloaded. Of course, you can also upload other maps to the unit. Those are the ones with the handy little "X"s on them! Given that the Colorados aren't out yet, I don't expect anyone here to have a hands-on report on them yet (unless you were at CES or they're showing Colorados at Macworld), but has anyone read any details about the topo maps? For benchmarking, of course, one wants 1:24000. Now the Colorado 400t is in the mix with its preloaded topo maps-except that the Garmin website doesn't say which topos are included, or what scale they are. Klem's article about mapping GPS receivers in Caching Now had me drooling over the Delorme PN-20 and possibly the Bushnell ONIX200CR. With the imminent release of Garmin's Colorado series, I think it's time for a new discussion of which mapping GPS receivers benchmark hunters find most helpful.